Mike Conley GAME LOG 2010-11 Playoffs
| #
Rank
| DATE
DATE
| TM
Team
| OPP
Opponent Team
| RESULT
Result
| GS
Game Started
| MIN
Minutes on Court
| PTS
Points
| REB
Total Rebounds
| AST
Assists
| FG
Field Goals Made
| FGA
Field Goals Attempted
| FG%
Field Goal Percentage
| 3P
Three-Pointers
| 3PA
Three-Pointers Attempted
| 3P%
Three-Point Percentage
| FT
Free Throws Made
| FTA
Free Throws Attempted
| FT%
Free Throw Percentage
| OREB
Offensive Rebounds
| DREB
Defensive Rebounds
| STL
Steals
| BLK
Blocks
| BLKA
Blocked Attempts
| TO
Turnovers
| PF
Personal Fouls
| +/-
Plus Minus
| DD
Double Doubles
| TD
Triple Doubles
| FB
First Basket
| FTB
First Team Basket
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | May 15 | MEM | @ OKC | L 105-90 | * | 40:09 | 18 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 19 | 36.8% | 2 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | -18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | May 13 | MEM | vs OKC | W 95-83 | * | 40:22 | 11 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | May 11 | MEM | @ OKC | L 99-72 | * | 32:10 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | May 9 | MEM | vs OKC | L 133-123 | * | 37:30 | 16 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 16.7% | 1 | 6 | 16.7% | 11 | 12 | 91.7% | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | May 7 | MEM | vs OKC | W 101-93 | * | 47:04 | 18 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | May 3 | MEM | @ OKC | L 111-102 | * | 41:06 | 24 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 15 | 66.7% | 3 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | May 1 | MEM | @ OKC | W 114-101 | * | 38:44 | 15 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 83.3% | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | +4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | Apr 29 | MEM | vs SAS | W 99-91 | * | 24:31 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | +8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | Apr 27 | MEM | @ SAS | L 110-103 | * | 42:43 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 20 | 45.0% | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | +2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Apr 25 | MEM | vs SAS | W 104-86 | * | 36:56 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | +4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Apr 23 | MEM | vs SAS | W 91-88 | * | 40:34 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 12 | Apr 20 | MEM | @ SAS | L 93-87 | * | 40:43 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | Apr 17 | MEM | @ SAS | W 101-98 | * | 44:17 | 15 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 39.0 | 197 | 50 | 83 | 71 | 183 | 38.8% | 11 | 37 | 29.7% | 44 | 53 | 83.0% | 7 | 43 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 30 | 39 | -2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||||||